All countries

Silfio country intelligence · GRN

Grenada

0.5% annual probability
Population

N/A

GDP

N/A

Currency

N/A

Capital

N/A

Land area

N/A

Official languages

N/A

Risk assessment

Risk profile

Grenada’s 12-month probability of a new armed-conflict onset is 0.5%, representing a minimal risk. The country’s small population, limited military capacity, and longstanding parliamentary institutions constrain the ability of domestic or foreign actors to sustain violence. Its main modern conflict, the 1983 crisis and subsequent US-led intervention, remains an exceptional episode rather than a recurring pattern.

Recent reporting reviewed contains no specific indication of armed mobilisation, insurgent activity, politically organised violence, or an external threat reaching Grenadian territory. Grenada’s principal political actors operate through established constitutional channels, while no neighbouring state or armed group is identified as preparing operations against the country. No prediction market is available for Grenada.

The main uncertainty is whether an abrupt political rupture, severe institutional crisis, or unexpected external confrontation could overcome these safeguards. Risk would rise most clearly with sustained armed clashes involving state forces or organised domestic groups, or a credible foreign threat to Grenadian territory; it would be reinforced as minimal by continued peaceful political competition and the absence of organised armed mobilisation.

Strategic reasoning

  • Grenada’s conflict history is concentrated in the 1979–1983 revolutionary period and the October 1983 intervention. Since then, constitutional politics and the absence of a persistent insurgency have supported a minimal new-onset risk.
  • The strongest stabilising factors are limited military capacity, functioning political institutions, and the lack of identified armed groups or neighbouring actors with an evident territorial dispute involving Grenada. These conditions distinguish domestic new-onset risk from any overseas activity by Grenadian personnel.

Critical indicators

  • October 1983: The United States and Caribbean partners intervened in Grenada after the collapse of the revolutionary government and the killing of Prime Minister Maurice Bishop. This is the country’s defining modern armed-conflict episode, but it has not produced a continuing conflict theatre.
  • Since the restoration of parliamentary government after 1983, Grenada has experienced regular constitutional political competition without a sustained insurgency or recurring armed confrontation. That established pattern supports the current minimal risk level.

Probability trend

How the Grenada estimate has moved

Probability0.5%0.5%0.5%

Aug 26

Aug 31

Sep 1

Date

Regional context

Grenada compared with its neighbours and region

Grenada ranks number 138 of 195 in new conflict outbreak risk.

Figures are each country's modelled probability of a new armed conflict on its territory within the next 12 months. Select any country to open its full profile.

Related coverage

ISTAF Berlin 2026 Ergebnisse: Fünf deutsche Siege und ein 42 Jahre alter Rekord

berlinmagazine.de

ISTAF Berlin 2026 Ergebnisse: Fünf deutsche Siege und ein 42 Jahre alter Rekord

Read source
Banque Misr, Egypt’s second-largest, hit by US sanctions: What to know - Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada And Caribbean News

grenadachronicle.com

Banque Misr, Egypt’s second-largest, hit by US sanctions: What to know - Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada And Caribbean News

Read source
Niger mutiny puts Russia’s expanding role in the Sahel to the test - Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada And Caribbean News

grenadachronicle.com

Niger mutiny puts Russia’s expanding role in the Sahel to the test - Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada And Caribbean News

Read source